Diddy states that the federals had “ascent” ribbons before the raids: Allhyp

Sean “Diddy” combs’ The legal team is shooting by the government’s search orders, arguing that federal agents cheated the Court and hid crucial evidence, including what their lawyers call “ascent” tapes that claim that they show that the alleged victims were arranged participants.

In the last legal dispute between Diddy and prosecutors, their lawyers claim that the government “looked for several search orders to search

The residences of Mr. Combs, its electronic devices and their person, and presented a very distorted image of the facts. “

The presentation argues that the federal agents omitted key evidence that undermined their case, including text messages between alleged victims and the hip-hop tycoon.

“Order applications presented an image of very distorted reality,” said his lawyer Alexandra Ae Shapiro. “The government had in its possession, for example, a variety of evidence … suggesting the participation of the victim-1 in the alleged ‘Freak offs’ (FOS) was voluntary and consensual, not coerced as the Government suggested in its requests. “

Diddy, who has been arrested at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn since his arrest in September, faces Rico and sexual traffic charges.

Prosecutors allege He directed a criminal company centered on drugs, sex trafficking and obstruction of justice.

But their lawyers argue that arrest orders used to arrest it and seize their digital devices, ICloud accounts and even their hotel room Park Hyatt was too broad and unconstitutional.

The motion exploits federal agents for allegedly omitting exculpatory evidence in their requests of order.

“The Government hid evidence undermining the credibility of these witnesses and presented deceptive and selective accounts. We are not dealing here with omission of some auxiliary facts. This is a case of systematic deception, ”said Shapiro. “Order applications” calculated to deceive, “omit” clearly critical “evidence.”

Diddy’s team is pressing a Franks audience,A legal procedure To determine if the government deliberately cheated the judge by obtaining the search orders.

His lawyers claim that the statements of probable cause were “intentionally deceptive” and that the authorities “leaked harmful information” before executing what they describe as “military -style incursions” into their properties.

In particular, the motion is concentrated in what prosecutors have described as a key evidence: supposed ribbons of “ascent”, which the Government affirms that it documes Diddy’s participation in sexual trafficking.

The defense argues that these recordings were in federal custody before the agents raided their homes and should have been revealed previously.

“The accusations of government obstruction were largely based on texts and statements taken out of context,” Shapiro added, claiming even more than almost all witnesses against Diddy had “a financial reason to manufacture or beautify.”

However, the Government has previously responded that Diddy has been involved in a pattern of witness manipulation, including the use of telephone privileges of other inmates, taking advantage of social networks to influence public opinion and try to pay witnesses.

A judge denied his bail of $ 50 million, citing concerns that he could obstruct justice if he is released.

But Diddy’s legal team insists that the evidence chosen by the government conforms to its narrative, claiming that “misrepresentations and deceptive omissions in arrest orders are frequent and stamped.”

The court still has to decide whether to grant a Franks hearing or will suppress the evidence obtained from the searches.

If you succeed, Diddy’s motion could significantly weaken the government’s case before his May 2025.

Related