close
close
The Trump Department of Justice Executor is no stranger to complaints about his conduct

The Trump Department of Justice Executor is no stranger to complaints about his conduct

By Joshua Goodman, Jim Mustian and Eric Tucker

Washington (AP) – A group of Criminal Defense lawyers from Manhattan was so concerned about the professionalism of prosecutor Emil Bove that they joined to send an email to their bosses.

A lawyer complained in the 2018 email that Bove was “completely reckless and out of control” in how he handled his cases. Another, annoying of rudeness and power plays, said he needed “adult supervision.” A third, a main federal public defender in the city, said “cannot be bothered to treat minor mortals with respect or empathy.”

Bove, Then, a hard cargo prosecutor in the United States prosecutor for the Southern District of New YorkHe was barely punished for complaints.

Instead, he printed email and covered it in a cork meeting in his office so that others would see it, according to a person who worked with Bove. The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity to speak frankly to a former colleague, said Bove considered that email was an honor badge.

The almost decade of Bove as a prosecutor, an era in which he addressed high -profile cases amid complaints about his polarizing behavior, provides clues about how he sees his current role as the main executor of President Donald Trump in the Department of Justice. In just a month as an official of Department No. 2, the little known Bove has advanced through norms and subtleties, If you scolding FBI’s leadership for “insubordination” By rejecting your request to deliver the names of the agents who investigated the January 2021 Assault in the Capitol of the United States or Forcing the lawyers who worked those cases.

Earl this month, He pressed the former colleagues to leave the charges against the mayor of New York City For reasons not related to the strength of the case, flying decades of norms of the Department of Justice.

The movements have stimulated the intense criticism of legal and former prosecutors. They worry that Bove who represented Trump in federal and state criminal prosecutorsIt is solving scores for the president, not impartially directing the Department of Justice. Leaving aside such concerns, Bove has tried to aggressively implement Trump’s agenda in a way that is not surprising for many who knew him when he was litigating cases of drugs and terrorism.

“In my experience, litigating against him, what I enjoyed as a prosecutor was an entangier power: the worst possible feature for a public servant,” said Christine Chung, a former federal prosecutor who, as a defense lawyer, has faced Bove. “But people will not speak against them because it is also vindictive, since they are now making clear.”

The Department of Justice declined to comment in response to an AP request to interview Bove along with a detailed list of questions about his past behavior.

“He is doing the work Trump was chosen to do,” said Christopher Kise, who met Bove when they worked together in Trump’s legal defense team. “You have to let people know the control seriously. The process can sometimes mess up, but if you are going to bake a cake, you have to break some eggs. “

Kise added that he was surprised by Bove’s interpretation by former colleagues as a villain determined to enforce Trump’s agenda at any cost.

“It’s exceptionally intelligent,” said Kise, “and respectful of different points of view.”

Emil Bove
Archive: Lawyer Emil Bove is the day of a sentence hearing in the criminal case in which President -elect Donald Trump was sentenced in 2024 for charges involving money from silence paid to a porn star, outside the Criminal Court of New York in Manhattan in New York City, January 10, 2025. (Brendan McDermid, photo of the pool through AP, file)

Agitation in the Department of Justice

As an interim attached attorney general, Bove has been essential to lead the effort to remodel the department of the FBI and justice, moving to identify the agents involved in the investigations of the Capitol’s riots and make clear to the prosecutors their expectation that They follow their orders.

February 14, for example, convened a call with prosecutors in the public integrity section of the Department of Justice And he gave them an hour to choose two people to present the motion to dismiss charges against the mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, although other prosecutors had already renounced the board to throw the case.

Particularly its order was surprising for the FBI to deliver a list of thousands of agents who participated in the investigations of January 6, a request seen by some in the office as a precursor of a purge.

The scrutiny of FBI’s professional agents is very unusual since base agents do not select their cases.

Back To Top