Why Godswill Akpabio Wife Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Go to Court

President of the Senate, wife Unoma Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan

10 minutes Wey Don Pass

Say wife of the president of the Senate of Nigeria, Unoma Akpabio, does not present multiple demands against Di Senator Wey Dey represents Kogi Central for the National Assembly Di, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Mrs. Akpabio Dey accuses Di Senator for violation of her fundamental rights and defamation, comes from statements that make on the floor of Di Senate and during a televised interview in Arise’s news.

She also demands n250 billion as damage and charges of N1 billion.

Say Wey Legal Actions, she presented Bifor di Federal Territory Territory of the Superior Court for Abuja, Dey see Senator Natasha accuses the president of Di Senate Godswill Akpabio of sexual harassment during an interview with news of emerge on Friday, February 28.

For the interview by Di, Senator Nastaha Bin claim says that the president of Di Senate, victimizes her bicos, she is not a sexual advance.

Mrs. Akpabio Wey reacted Senator Natasha claims for a press conference, Tok says that he lies and only creates content for her personal profits, while threatening legal actions against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Wetin Dey Di demands

Di adapts to Wey BBC Pidgin, see, say, Mrs. Akpabio files two demands against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

For the first lawsuit on the violation of fundamental rights (demand no: CV/814/25), Madam Akpabio argues, for example, Di Senator’s statement on February 2, and during the television interview of Di “Flagrant Violation” of his fundamental human rights guaranteed by the Nigerian Constitution of Di more Di Di Di Letter of Human Rights and Peoples.

She cites section 34 (1) (a) of the Constitution of Di 1999 (amended), the wife of the president of Di Senate, Dey, seeks multiple legal remedies, includes: “A statement says that comments from senators violate their fundamental rights and their subject to their children with emotional and psychological anguish.

“A statement says that the accusations of Wey Di demanded on the floor of Di Senate on February 20, 2025 and the scandalous and salary accusations that she made in the arroe of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amates), Article 4 (1) (a) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amates), Article 4 (1) (a) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amy. On Human Rights and Peoples (Ratification and Application Law) Cap.

“A perpetual court order of preventing the defendant from making incitable, scandalous and resentment statements that have caused emotional and psychological and emotional abuse and their children under a constant threat and fear of their lives.

Mrs. Akpabio wants “N250 billion in Wetin damage that describes as examples, punitive, aggravated and general damage suffered from Di Senator’s statement.

For a separate defamation lawsuit no: CV/816/25, statement by Di Senator di Senator di Senator, says that her husband makes sexual advances towards her.

She describes Di’s accusations as false, malicious and harmful. Add, for example, the accusation, do not bring your family to a shame and public shame.

“A statement says that the defendant claim on national television, says Di, the claimant husband, is president of Di Senate of the Federal Republic of Di de Nigeria, sexual progress, without any proof of them, does not spoil the reputation of Di claimant and, in fact, his whole family, when he takes Dem in the bad description and the opprobrium.

She wants to make the court order to the defendant who issues a formal retraction in writing of the most tender defamatory words unconditional to the claimant and her family. She publishes an apology by two reading newspapers nationwide.

Di Senate President of the wife also wants to make a court order of Natasha –

An order of the Honorable Court of DIS to pay the mandatory defendant to pay his sum of ₦ 1 billion (only one billion naira) as punitive and exemplary damages for the dilatory effect of the defamatory words of Di defendants in the family reputation of Di Claims. “

A perpetual court order that does not restrict Di Demandado to pronounce more words or defamatory propagation, any defamatory words against the reputation of the demanding family.

Di Court Neva fixes any date for the audience of two costumes.

Wetin causes recent disagreement

Di Recent GBBASGBOS between the president of the Senate of Di Godswill Akpabio and Senator Akpoti-Uduagan Afa AFTA Di Kogi Central Senator Discover Say Dem Don Change his seats for the Di Senate Chamber without his knowledge.

She protests for action on the floor of Di House, causes a small Kasala during a plenary session.

Later, Di Senate will send his case to the Committee of Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, Senator Neda Imaseun of Edo South, Dey Lident for Investigation.

Di Senate gives the committee of two weeks to present the Dia report.

In response, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan Bin files ₦ 100 billion demands against the president of the Senate Akpabio and the legislative assistant of IM, Mfon Patrick, for defamation.

His lawyer, Victor Giwa, Tok says that Oga Patrick Publica Di alleged defamation on the IM Facebook page with title, ‘Is the local content committee of the Senate Natasha Birthright?’

Di Post acknowledge Akpoti-Uduaghan says he thinks he says he is Senator Na on the use of makeup and transparent outfits come to the camera.

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyer describes the statement di as provocative and harmful, Giwa Tok says that the reputation of the IM client is not reduced among his colleagues and public.

On Friday, February 28, Di Mata intensified with the Akpoti-Uduaghan program in the morning program Arise Television and accuses Akpabio of sexual harassment.

She claims for the interview for saying the television station Di says that some of her colleagues Bin warn that she accepts the change of seat “bicos na part of a plot against her.”

Meanwhile, Akpabio’s wife, Don denies the accusations, she describes DEM as “false and without foundation.”