The Superior Court of Madhya Pradesh imposes the cost in the state while allowing 2020 Pil by claiming the violation of the Land Acquisition Law

The Bank Bank of the Superior Court of Madhya Pradesh imposed a cost of RS. 30,000 in the state, while allowing you to present your presentations written in a 2020 PIL, challenging government notification because it violates the 2013 land acquisition law to the extent that the multiplier factor for the calculation of the value of the value of the value of the value of Earth Market.

The Bank of the Division of President of the Supremo Southern Court Kumar Kait and Judge Vivek Jain In his order he said that “The last chance was granted to respondents to present the written shipping order of the date of 19.2024. Since then, video order dated 08.01.2025 was granted longer, no more time was granted, which would not be accepted with the cost of RS. 15,000/, despite the fact that the written presentation has not been presented. The defendant’s lawyer looks for more than two weeks of time to present the presentation in writing, however, said said will be subject to the cost of RS. 15,000/-pel to be paid to the petitioner. The previous cost of RS. 15000/- It will also be deposited in favor of the Legal Services Committee of the Superior Court of MP in terms of order of 08.01.2025. These amounts will be paid within two weeks and, upon receiving said amount, the written presentation will be accepted. “

For the context, the first schedule of the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, the 2013 reapsented and resettlement law establishes that the factor by which the market value must be multiplied in the case of rural areas It must be 1.0 (one) to 2.0 (two), to be based on the distance of the rural area under the acquisition of the urban area, according to notification by the appropriate government.

The statement defies a notification approved by the Madhya Pradesh government that states that it contravenes the provisions of the 2013 Law. It is argued that section 26 (2) (the determination of the land market value by the collector) and the Section 30 (2) It is read together with the first time of the 2013 Law makes it clear that for rural areas the multiplier factor will be more than 1 and between 1 and 2 according to the distance of the project from the urban area. However, the state government in its notification of September 29, 2014 notified this multiplier factor as only 1, which the guilty declaration is in clear violation of the provisions of the law.

Section 30 (2) establishes that the collector will issue individual awards that detail the details of the compensation payable and the details of the payment of the compensation as specified in the first time.

During the audience of January 28, the state lawyer presented, “At first, we have to present a written answer and shipping. I apologize since we have not been able to present the presentation. “

At this stage, the petitioner’s lawyer said that the court had also imposed a cost of RS. 15,000 in the state. He appeared “On the last two occasions they were given the last chance. They are not interested. It is an open and closed case. “

From then on, the Court asked the lawyer for the state of how long they would take to which the lawyer sought two weeks.

From then on, the court, while heading to the state lawyer, said: “This is the request of 2020. Neither you present the answer nor this … because there is no interim order, do not care about that. 5 years have passed. How many decades will you take?

The matter now appears in the week that begins on February 17.

Case title: Narmada Bachao Andoolan versus the state of Madhya Pradesh, Writing request No. 7320 of 2020

Click here to read/download order