Delhi HC looks for Openai’s response in Ani Copyright suit

The Superior Court of Delhi, asked the Chatgpt Openai manufacturer to submit an answer regarding a request submitted by the Indian Music Industry (IMI) that he sought to intervene in a lawsuit initiated by the Asian News International news agency (ANI ). The demand accuses OpenAI of the unauthorized use of ANI’s content to train and operate chatgpt.

Last week, IMI, T-Series and Saregama India moved before HC to join the demand for the author of ANI against Operai. Responding to the plea, Judge Amit Bansal commented: “We cannot continue expanding the scope of the demand; it can submit its own demand. Hundreds of industries can be affected by it.”

However, the lawyer Senior Chander Lall, on behalf of IMI, argued that the organization is directly affected by the case. “We will not go one step beyond reach. We will come at the end, we will only complement what remains. Allow ourselves to present arguments about the law,” he said.

Lall further emphasized the importance of the case of the copyright law, stating: “What my lord will decide to determine the copyright law in the future. If we all present costumes, it will create a bigger chaos.”

Openai, in response, said the matter is already scheduled for the hearing on Friday (February 21), to which Judge Bansal agreed, stating: “to have it the same day, we will see.”

Subsequently, the Court issued notices to all parties, which allowed them to respond to the intervention request. The lawyer Sidhant Kumar, by ANI, sought permission to present an response to IMI’s intervention, arguing that the issue in question refers to audio rights. Amicus Curiae Adarsh ​​Ramanujan was also present to help the court. The matter now appears for the audience on February 21.