Startup joining Ani vs Operai Case

Two more parts have submitted applications before the Superior Court of Delhi, which seek to intervene in the demand for the violation of the current copyright between ANI and OpenAI. The Indian Government and Policy Project (IGAP), a research group and a group of experts focused on technology, submitted its application on February 19, with the declared purpose of “presenting policy nuances in the light of the existing jurisprudence. ” However, they declined to comment since the matter was subjudice.

The other part is Flux Labs AI, a small startup incorporated last year.

Abhishek Nevatia, co -founder of Flux Labs AI, explained to Medianama that they wanted to present their opinion on the case about their implications of public interest.

A license fees regime could affect the growth of the India’s industry

Speaking about his decision to submit the application, Nevatia argued that demanding that the companies pay the license fees to use publicly available data of the Internet would make it difficult for them to work. He also declared that it would make it more expensive to use AI products, since the companies will pass the downstream rates. “In addition, if you eliminate many publicly available data from the models training corpus, the models worsen. That is also a big problem, ”he added.

Flux Labs operates a platform called Zoop, which Nevatia described as a “social and live commercial market.” The company has built a series of AI functions on its platform using GPT4-O.

Nevatia also felt that smaller companies will not be able to pay the payment license fees to the editors. “If they will not be able to trust the data that they can acquire in a not so expensive way, how will India compete or these companies with global companies?” asked.

“Every time something new arrives, interrupts traditional industries. It will make people lose money. He’s going to do things a little more difficult, ”he said. The businessman also argued that while editors can suffer in the short term, AI has the potential to benefit many more people in the long term by making knowledge more accessible.

Nevatia also believed that simply storing publicly available data and using them to train AI models did not equal copyright.

Background:

Indian news agency Asian News International (ANI) is currently chasing A demand against the OpenAI technological firm for the violation of copyright, claiming that it stored and used ANI data to train large language models (LLM) without authorization. The news agency also claimed that Chatgpt, the chatbot with AI of OpenAi, has sometimes produced litinated copies of ANI content and even attributed false statements to Ani.

On the other hand, OpenAi argued That the Superior Court of Delhi lacks jurisdiction in this case, since Openai servers were located in the United States.

IGAP and FLX LABS AI carry the total number of intervention applications to five, after previous attempts from industry organizations such as the Federation of Indian Editorshe Digital News Editors Association (Dnpa) and the Indian music industry (IMI). The three tried to intervene in the lawsuit, claiming that the case affected the copyright owners in different industries.

In an audience last month, OpenAi opposite The inclusion of the Federation of Indian Editors and the DNPA in the demand, arguing that the problems they raised were different from which ANIs were mentioned in their request.

Ads