Blake Lively hits Justin Baldoni’s ‘lack of respect’ by victims of sexual harassment in privacy debate

Blake Lively He is shooting after being accused of trying to “prevent the public from” seeing “relevant evidence” in his legal battle against Justin Baldoni.

After Lively’s recent request from a Improved protection order – which requested a stipulation of “only the lawyer’s eyes” to maintain certain information outside the public eye during the discovery process: Baldoni’s legal team presented a letter to Judge Lewis Liman on Tuesday, February 25.

“Given how actively the animated parties have published and litigated the claims of Mrs. Lively in the media, we are now surprised how vehemently wants to prevent the public from accessing material and relevant evidence”, lawyer, “lawyer”, Mitchell Schuster wrote in the letter, obtained by Deadline.

Schuster accused Lively, 37, and his “routinely” camp making an effort to “rehabilitate his fogged image with bold statements to the press”, claiming Lively “has already published the alleged details of the so -called ‘harassment’.” Working with Baldoni, 41, in his film It ends with us.

Related: Blake Lively says he received ‘violent’ messages in the midst of Justin Baldoni’s demand

According to the reports, Blake Lively requested an order of protection in her light and ends with the ongoing legal battle of the US director of Justin Baldoni. Lively, 37, and her husband Ryan Reynolds presented a letter to a judge on Thursday, February 20, Us Weekly can confirm, ask for a stronger protection order than they were granted. (Dynamic (…)

“Therefore, Mrs. Lively lacks a belief of” good faith “that there is information of such” personally sensitive nature “that the dissemination of the parties” would unnecessarily violate (their) privacy rights, “the letter continued.

Schuster argued that Lively’s request to improve the initial protection order that previously granted in the legal battle “is not justified”, claiming that “the Lively parties have not explained and cannot explain why” the order of protection order model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model Court is “insufficient.” (The letter also put a blow to Ryan Reynoldswhich appeared in a “planned parody” on the dispute during Saturday Night LiveIt is recent 50 Special Anniversary.

In response, Lively’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb He issued a four -page letter on Tuesday, calling “the insensitive contempt and lack of respect for a woman who defends by the most basic protections in the workplace against sexual harassment” demonstrated by Baldoni and those of her side. According to the lawyer, a protection order is “standard and expected even in the most mundane civil litigation.”

Gottlieb also claimed that it is known that “certain creators of online content” “repeat the Wayfarer party line” with “deceptive accusations” about Lively’s intentions.

“The trips of the erroneous characterization adopted by the opposition through this Eco Chamber manufactured, by themselves, provide broad justification for a protection order that establishes adequate protections for third -party privacy interests,” the letter continued.

Related: Justin Baldoni’s lawyer reacts to Blake Lively’s gag order

Justin Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman has strongly responded to Blake Lively’s request from a gag order in the current legal case of the old cars that surround the filming that ends with us. “The irony is not lost in anyone that Mrs. Lively is so petrified of the truth that she has moved to gag her”, Freedman (…)

Animated called Baldoni, who directed and starred with her in It ends with us – In December 2024 demand for sexual harassmentclaiming Baldoni promoted a “hostile work environment.” He amended his complaint at the beginning of this month, detailing the “emotional impact” of the ongoing legal battle.

Baldoni denied the accusations of harassment of Lively before submitting his own demands against The New York Times – The exit that originally published the accusations of Lively, and against Lively, Reynolds and his publicist. He Times He has defended his reports, recently calling “inaccuracies” In the legal presentations of Baldoni. Lively and Reynolds, for their parts, have continued to deny Baldoni’s defamation claims. (Earlier this month, the Lively publicist presented a motion to withdraw from Baldoni’s demand).

An initial hearing took place on February 3, during which Judge Liman said Couple proof date – Established for March 2026 – could move if the details of your case continue to be “litigated in the press.”