Singapurense woman killed in Spain: DNA of two men who are in the victim’s clothes

WHAT HAPPENED

Mrs. Fang had been traveling alone in Spain when her body was found near a parking area for trucks in the city of Abanilla on April 10, 2024.

It was reported that a preliminary autopsy report found that knife wounds and head trauma were the cause of his death, it was reported.

NGO, who was arrested six days after Mrs. Fang was found, has been the only suspect in his murder.

The closed circuit television cameras at the hotel where he stayed captured him around 5.45 pm on April 9, 2024, dressed in a hoodie and black pants.

The local news site The truth previously cited the prosecutors who said that NGO took Mrs. Fang to a parking lot near a restaurant in Abanilla around 11 pm to April 9, before the car went away at 11.45 pm

According to the report, prosecutors believe that Mrs. Fang was no longer in the car when she left the parking lot.

NGO returned to the hotel around 2 in the morning of April 10, with jeans and a blue sweater.

The Spanish Police has shown that Mrs. Fang’s mobile phones were together in Abanilla on the day he died, the local newspaper Levante the Valencian mercantile said.

According to the judge who supervises the case, it is inferred “without a doubt” that both Singapureans were in the same area and, at the same time, the slot of the day the crime was committed, according to the data provided by the mobile phone operators in Abanilla.

NGO and Mrs. Fang had met for more than 10 years and was made A beneficiary of its central provision fund (CPF) – A mandatory social security savings scheme, approximately six months before his death.

Around the moment that Mrs. Fang nominated NGO as her beneficiary, almost S $ 200,000 (US $ 148,000) was deposited in her CPF account.

Manuel Martínez, the lawyer who represents Mrs. Fang’s family, said previously that the 39 -year -old CPF account was over € 430,000 (US $ 462,000).

In February, Verdard reported that prosecutors were looking for a murder position against NGOs, and private prosecution claimed that there was sufficient criminality evidence “to bring it to trial.

However, the defense requested that the case be dismissed and requested new procedures, including an analysis of experts independent of the NGO telephone and their own testimony.

The NGO lawyer argued that it was necessary to perform several tests in the case, and that NGO has lost contact with his family.