Donald Trump urged to release Harry’s documents for the main politician of the United Kingdom

A former British Interior Secretary has joined the campaign to convince Donald Trump To free Prince HarryVisa documents during a visit to Washington, DC

Why does it matter

Braverman’s sauce is still a legislator of the United Kingdom and immigration was within his term while directed by the United Kingdom Ministry, one of the largest jobs in the government, between October 2022 and November 2023.

It was also his former department that Harry demanded in an effort to restore her police officers, although she entered the position through the process.

What to know

Now, he has supported a campaign of the Heritage Foundation to press Trump to free Prince Harry’s immigration documents about his past use of drugs.

Braverman put on his shoulder with Nile Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Heritage’s freedom, in a video of social networks.

“I think there is a very strong case for President Trump to intervene and direct the release and dissemination of these documents,” he said.

“The American people should have the right to know what happened here. Prince Harry is a citizen who has come to the United States.”

“We need to know if he broke the rules to enter the United States. If the American people have the right to know and those who allowed that to be accounts,” he continued.

“Or Prince Harry received special treatment in his application to enter the United States. And if that happened again, that is unacceptable and the American people have the right to know.”

Prince Harry’s American dream under threat

Heritage says that Prince Harry must have lied about his previous use of drugs in visa forms or having received special treatment by the National Security Department (DHS) and argues that the public has the right to know what happened.

He also says that Harry should not have given a visa due to his experimentation with cannabis, magical fungi, ayahuasca and cocaine, significantly increasing bets beyond a simple transparency problem.

If Harry were forced to leave America, he would break the dream of the United States. The Sussex family at a time when they are deeply unpopular in their homeland, Great Britain.

If that would really happen it is another matter, but Trump has said previously: “If you lied, they will have to take appropriate measures.”

He advances to a judicial hearing in a lawsuit of the Law of Freedom of Information that Heritage presented against the DHS to try to force the release of Harry’s documents on February 5.

As they reveal Newsweek On Tuesday, it will be the first important test of whether the DHS policy on the subject will change under Trump, after the past accusations, even by Trump himself, that the Biden administration was protecting Harry.

Who is Braverman’s room?

At one point, Braverman was in the race to become the leader of the Conservative Party while he was in the Government, which would have made her the prime minister if she had won. It was eliminated in the second voting round.

His comments are perhaps the greatest hostile intervention by a politician of the conservative party in the five years that Harry has been in the United States.

This is mainly due to the fact that the most important figures of the party have diverted commenting on the most controversial aspects of the royal soap opera, but the state of Braverman has changed significantly in recent years.

It was previously described as the “dear of Tory’s right” by The Guardian, Although they also noticed that it has been more recently a “political outcast.”

What people say

Braverman said: “I think there is a very strong case for President Trump to intervene and direct the release and dissemination of these documents.”

Trump previously told the Express daily: “I wouldn’t protect it (Harry). He betrayed the queen. That is unforgivable. He would be alone if it were for me.”

DHS lawyers have previously said in a presentation that heritage “The supposed evidence of government irregularities simply equal to a ‘suspicion of government misconduct, which is insufficient to cancel the privacy interests of the Duke.”

Judge Carl J. Nichols previously rescinds the case, dismissing Heritage’s request and said in a presentation: “As the heritage says,” (i) f the records do not shed light on those questions, or show that, in fact, the expected impropriety did not happen, then the case is immediately coming to an end; There is no need to evaluate the sufficiency of the affirmed public interest of the plaintiffs or the complex equilibrium investigation.

Heritage is now trying to revoke his failure.

What happens later

Nichols called the parties, not including Harry, the Federal Court on DC on February 5 for a hearing on Heritage’s attempt to rekindle the lawsuit.

Jack Royston is the main real correspondent of Newsweekwith London headquarters. You can find it in X, previously Twitterin @jack_royston and read your stories in Newsweek‘s The Royalty Facebook page.

Do you have any questions about Charles and Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, or his family who wants him to answer our experienced real correspondents? Send an email to [email protected]. We would love to know about you.