Diddy’s lawyers challenge the search orders, aims to suppress evidence in the new presentation

Evidence the federal prosecutors obtained through the searches of the houses of Sean “Diddy” combs in Los Angeles and Miami and in other places they must be suppressed because the arrest orders authorized by these searches were unconstitutional, the defense lawyers argued on Sunday in A new judicial presentation.

The defense argued that the requests of order for the houses of Diddy, the accounts of ICloud, the telephones and the hotel room were too elapsed, excluded facts that could have been favorable to the combs and “presented an image of the very distorted reality “

The strongly written defense motion does not publicly reveal the details of what prosecutors allegedly omitted, but said that requests of order eliminated an important context that the magistrate judge who approved them should have seen, including a certain witness that the defense said that I had reasons to manufacture and beautify.

“But it worked: the Government obtained its arrest orders, leaked harmful information and then executed its military style raids in combs residences,” defense lawyers said in the presentation. “Here, instead of giving the review magistrate a fair summary, the Government hid an exculpatory evidence to reinforce its case.”

The defense said that some of the most saucements counted in the applications of the search warrant come from a producer-1 without a name whose accusations “were never credible.” What the producer-1 told the researchers written, but the defense said that “stories had transmitted stories about his time working for combs.”

The motion said the government does not plan to call producer-1 to testify.

The motion sought to suppress all the evidence obtained through these searches or grant a hearing to examine the government’s conduct by obtaining arrest orders.

No comments from federal prosecutors who will instead offer a formal response in judicial documents.

Comps declared innocent of the conspiracy of extortion, sex trafficking and prostitution positions that are based on the accounts of at least three women. The defense has argued that at least one of those women, Cassie Ventura, was a participant arranged in the alleged “monsters” and not one participant coerced as prosecutors suggested.

The music tycoon has denied all the accusations made against him. The combs lawyers have previously said to ABC News: “Mr. combs has full confidence in the facts and integrity of the judicial process. In court, the truth will prevail: that Mr. Comink never sexually assaulted or trafficked anyone: Man or woman, adult or minor. “