Chloe Bailey sued for $ 15 million, here is why

Chlöe Bailey is being sued by a whopping $ 15 million for “exploiting” a composer who contributed to his 2024 ‘Trouble in Paradise’ album. Demand occurs in the midst of growing concerns about the rights of composers in the era of digital transmission.

Melvin Moore, who is also called 4rest, filed a demand for violation of copyright in New York on Thursday (02.20.25) against Bailey, Sony Music, Parkwood Entertainment and Columbia Records. The case highlights continuous discussions about appropriate attribution and compensation in the music industry.

In judicial documents, he claimed that he was not “properly accredited or compensated” for his work on the tracks ‘The same lingerie’, ‘favorite’ and ‘could also’. These songs have become notable clues of the last Bailey album since its launch.

Moore has accused the fraudulent misrepresent entities, violations of the Millennium digital copyright law (DMCA)Civil conspiracy and deceptive commercial practices. The DMCA has been crucial legislation that protects digital copyright in the music industry since its promulgation.

He said that his team “repeatedly made attempts in good faith to solve the issue of unauthorized commercial exploitation (Bailey, Parkwood and Columbia).” The sources suggest that there were resolution attempts before the demand was filed.

And now he is looking for $ 5 million in song damage and $ 150,000 per infraction. The substantial damage sought reflects the serious nature of the accusations and the potential commercial impact of the songs in question.

“It’s time for the industry to recognize the value of creatives that give life to music and compensate them fairly,” Moore said in the 33 -page document. His statement echoes broader concerns about compensation for composers in the modern music industry.

Meanwhile, Exterior wall He previously insisted that he chooses to “ignore” any violent reaction that his music can receive because he is “ordered” by his religious beliefs. The artist has maintained a presence in secular music and Gospel throughout her career.

Speaking in the Podcast ‘V-103’ of Audacy last year, he said: “I always want to let music speak for itself. And to be honest, no matter what do, people always find things to say about it, So I am used to it. walking in my purpose, and anyone who has a problem with that can kiss my loot. “

Demand comes at a significant time for Exterior wallwhose album ‘Trouble in Paradise’ has been making waves in the industry since its launch. The legal dispute has drawn attention to the album and its disputed clues.

Legal experts suggest that cases such as this highlight the complex nature of the contracts of the music industry and intellectual property rights in the digital age. The emergence of transmission platforms has complicated traditional models of compensation compensation and credit attribution.

The case also attracts attention to the broader theme of compensation compensation in the music industry. Appropriate credit and compensation remain crucial concerns for composers in the transmission era, where income models continue to evolve.

Bailey and Sony Music representatives have not yet responded publicly to demand, although industry experts suggest that discussions can be ongoing behind the scene. The music industry often sees similar disputes resolved through settlements outside the court.

This legal battle joins other cases of infringement of high profile copyright in the music industry, highlighting ongoing debates about creative rights and fair compensation. The result of this case could influence future discussions on the rights of composers in the era of digital transmission.

The dispute also underlines the importance of clear communication and documentation in musical collaborations, particularly in an era in which multiple creators often contribute to individual tracks. The industry continues to deal with these challenges as the methods of musical production and distribution evolve.